| Labels |
|
|
|
| Written by Steven Arness | |
| Thursday, 23 June 2005 | |
|
Labels, actually labels and boxes or the infamous pigeonholes, why if a
male does something out of the norm that it needs to get labeled
something other then it is? Like Metrosexual, why is such a label needed? Can't a male just do it and not have to use some kind of gimmick label to make it acceptable? Same with crossdressing, only males crossdress, females, never, even if the label says "Hanes his way" Why is it when I took ballet and jazz that there were only certain things that males were allowed to do and females something else? Course the females did more "sexy" and alluring moves then the males who were pretty much statues at times while the females flowed over them. Course I know there are some things that males get to do that females don't like male ice skaters get to lift females. That is unless your attend a UGFSA event in which they allow guys to do traditional female stuff and females to do traditional male stuff and not get penalized for doing so. I sure as heck can't think of any reason that males need any more labels then they already have, we already deal with enough false stereotyping as it is to muddy the waters further with more irrelevant terms. Steven Arness Related Items: |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
